How Sabine FBX® filters give you clear, crisp audio & more gain before feedback!

What makes a good feedback controller?

FBX vs dbx

Glossary of Terms
   • Gain
   • Feedback
   • Net Gain Before Feedback
   • Freq. Response Curves
   • Noise Gate/ Comb Filters
   • Constant-Q Filters
   • Parametric Equalizer
   • Fixed FBX® Filter
   • Dynamic FBX® Filter
   • Locked FBX® Filter
   • Filter Width
   • Setup Mode
   • Auto Setup Mode
   • Setup Mode Cautions

Other Sabine Informative Booklets: The Digital Delay Advantage (How to synchronize loudspeakers, eliminate comb filter distortion & align acoustic image)
Thirteen years after inventing the world’s first successful automatic feedback control device, Sabine, with its patented system, retains its technological lead.

Since microphones and amplified loudspeakers were first paired, acoustic feedback has lain in ambush, ready to sabotage sound systems, ear drums, listener enjoyment, and sound engineer egos with equal malice. Until Sabine came along, the various cures and preventative measures for feedback elimination were problematic, expensive, complicated, fraught with compromises in sound quality, and/or just plain didn’t work.

The ravages of runaway feedback continued unabated until 1990, when Sabine’s breakthrough brought the world its first practical automatic feedback controller: the FBX Feedback Exterminator. In the years since, Sabine’s products have proven to be easy to operate, reliable, and unrelentingly effective in providing 6-9 dB increases in feedback-free sound system gain with no audible effect on sound quality.

Our proprietary technology makes that claim even truer today than it was 13 years ago. Continuous advances and improvements mean that Sabine’s family of products delivers the purest audio and finest protection from all varieties and levels of feedback.

 By Doran Oster, President
Ever since Lee DeForest invented the first vacuum tube, engineers have walked the tightrope between feedback and system gain. The purpose of this guide is to give you the tools to get all the gain you need without the agony of feedback. We’ll start with a common-sense discussion of the techniques sound engineers now use to control feedback to get the most gain and clarity out of their sound systems.
Our imaginary work bench
Imagine a mic and speakers set up in a tiny shower room. Clap your hands. The sound reverberates back and forth between the tile walls and floor. Just a touch of the volume fader fills the room with screeching feedback. Now move our sound system out to an open grassy field. Clap your hands. There is no echo. The speakers are well away from the microphone and there are no reflections, so now we can really crank up the system without a bit of feedback. Most sound systems have characteristics that fall between these two examples, but examining the extreme cases makes it easier to understand the more common in-between situations.

 Back to top
          What is acoustic feedback?
Feedback is the loud ringing sound that occurs when the sound leaving a speaker is picked up by a microphone and re-amplified again and again. (See Fig. 1.) The cycle repeats until the feedback reaches the system’s maximum loudness or until someone turns down the volume. Virtually every sound system that has a microphone and a speaker in the same room is susceptible to feedback.
Click images
to view

Feedback Loop
Fig. 1
 Back to top
          Which frequencies feed back?
All acoustic systems have distinct resonant frequencies. Regardless of where you thump a guitar’s top, it always responds with the same tone. This is the natural resonant frequency of the guitar. It is the frequency where all of the instrument’s components vibrate naturally as a unit. In sound systems, these resonant points are the frequencies where feedback occurs. Each of the system’s components, including and especially the room itself, has its own set of resonant frequencies. Each component adds together to produce the total system’s resonant frequencies. It is almost impossible to predict which frequencies will feed back without first “thumping” the system, but you only have to turn up the amp for them to rudely reveal themselves. The frequency that feeds back first is the one that requires the least amount of energy to excite the resonance. If you remove the first feedback frequency, the next feedback frequency will be the one that requires the second least amount of energy, and so on.
  Back to top
          Controlling feedback
In order for feedback to occur, the amplifier has to be turned up enough so that sound from the speaker re-enters the microphone louder imaginary experiment, feed-back easily occurred in the shower room because the sound leaving the speakers did not dissipate very much before re-entering the microphone. But when we move the speakers away in the open field, the sound energy dissipates as it radiates away from the speakers. If there are no surfaces to reflect the sound back to the mic, the sound quickly loses energy, dropping to one quarter the energy every time the distance from the speakers is doubled. By the time the sound finally reaches the microphone, the sound energy is weaker than the original sound, so there is no feedback.

From this example we deduce the Prime Directive of Feedback Control: Keep the sound emanating from the speakers away from the microphones as much as possible.

Here are the most common tricks of the trade for controlling feedback:
  • Stand close to the microphone. Speak loudly and clearly so that you do not have to amplify the sound too much.
  • Each open microphone has a chance to feed back. Mute or turn down the gain of any microphone that is not in use. Noise gates can be helpful for this.
  • Mount the microphones in fixed positions. Moving the microphone around on the stage increases the chances that the microphone and the speaker will form new resonant paths.
  • Use cardioid or hyper-cardioid microphones, and point the mics away from the speakers. They pick up much less sound from the backside of the mic, which protects against monitor feedback. Be careful not to put your hand on or too close to the microphone’s screen, since this can cover the ports that enable the heart-shaped (hence cardioid) rejection pattern.
  • Place the speakers in front of the microphones so there is not a direct path back to the microphone.
  • Aim the speakers so the sound does not reflect directly off a wall back into the mic. You can estimate the speaker’s dispersion pattern (the area that is directly “sprayed” with sound) for the mids and high frequencies by imagining rays of light radiating out of the speaker’s horns. If you can see the center part of the horn, you are probably in the dispersion pattern. Lower frequency sounds tend to radiate out in all directions from all sides of the speakers.
  • Make the surfaces of the room as sound absorbent as possible to reduce sound reflections. Use acoustical absorbing tiles in the ceiling, put down carpeting, and hang curtains. In the real world of most performance spaces, you cannot always follow these anti-feedback techniques. Lead singers insist on pointing the monitors directly at the mic. Worship leaders insist on the mobility of a wireless microphone, and nightclub owners will not likely carpet the dance floor and hang velvet curtains. Even after you’ve tried all these tricks, you may still not have enough gain and clarity to satisfy the audience. Do the best you can, and then go on to the next level of feedback control: equalization
 Back to top
Equalizers (EQs) are sets of filters, or volume controls, for different parts of the audio spectrum. Since the earliest days, sound engineers have used equalizers for two distinctly different purposes: 1) To improve the tone quality and balance of the sound, and 2) To control feedback for extra gain and microphone mobility. Some types of EQs are best at shaping the tone and other types are better at controlling feedback. It may seem paradoxical to add filters to a sound system in order to increase the gain. But if you can use extremely narrow filters to turn down the frequencies that are feeding back, you will be able to increase the gain of all the other frequencies for a total net gain. There are essentially three categories of equalizers: graphic, parametric and adaptive parametric.
 Back to top
          Graphic EQ
Graphic EQs are basically a set of volume controls for individual sections of the audio spectrum. The earliest music equalizers were the bass and treble tone knobs. As technology advanced, these filters were narrowed to give more precise control. Today, the industry standard is called a 1/3-octave graphic equalizer, which has 31 individual volume controls spaced 3 per octave.

There is a common misconception in the industry about 1/3-octave EQs that is important to this discussion. Many industry veterans incorrectly presume that 1/3-octave EQs use 1/3-octave wide filters. If this were the case, the EQ filters would not be wide enough to create smooth curves. Instead, they would produce a notched frequency response that would make the EQ use-less for shaping the sound and useless for controlling feedback frequencies between the sliders.

Actually, most manufacturers use 3/4 to 1-octave wide overlapping filters placed on 1/3-octave center points. These wider filters provide the necessary smooth frequency response. (See Fig. 2.) It’s important to understand that the term “1/3-octave” refers to the spacing of the sliders, not the filter width.

Graphic EQs are excellent for shaping the sound, and they are fairly simple to use. However, using one-octave wide EQ filters to control feedback invariably causes an unnecessary decrease in the gain and fidelity of the program. It’s easy to see that if feedback occurs somewhere between the sliders, you will have to pull one of those EQ sliders down pretty far to eliminate feedback. That pulls out plenty of your program, too. On the other hand, you’ll get considerably more net gain and much better sound quality if you use wide graphic EQ filters for tone control and insist on narrow filters for feedback control. (See Fig. 3.) That’s where parametric EQs come in.
Click images
to view

Why Graphic EQs Cannot Fight Feedback
Fig. 2

FBX vs One-third Octave EQ
Fig. 3
 Back to top
In the quest for perfect sound, engineers developed very narrow tuned filters for controlling feedback points in auditoriums. In the early days of sound reinforcement, these filters were custom made to a specific frequency and width for a specific application. Now there are a number of commercially available parametric filter sets that allow engineers to dial-in the width, center frequency and depth of the filter.

The problem with parametrics is that they’re expensive, they require a good deal of expertise and auxiliary equipment to tune properly, they require constant retuning whenever the room acoustics change, and they are far too slow and cumbersome for catching feedback that occurs during the program.
 Back to top
Adaptive Parametric: The FBX® Solution
The Sabine FBX Feedback Exterminator® is the next step in the evolution of feedback control. The FBX® is essentially a self-tuning parametric EQ. It constantly monitors the program, searching for tones that have the overtone signature of feedback. Once feedback occurs, the FBX® automatically places a very narrow, constant-width filter directly on the feedback frequency and lowers it just deep enough to eliminate the ringing sound.

The FBX out performs other EQs five ways:
1. The FBX finds and eliminates feedback automatically before and during the program.
2. The FBX’s narrow filters eliminate feedback without losing the fidelity of the sound.
3. The FBX is fastest. It typically finds and eliminates feedback in less than one second.
4. The FBX gives the most gain. Use wide-filter graphic EQs for controlling the shape of the sound and narrow FBX filters for controlling feedback, and you’ll typically achieve a 6 to 9 dB increase in gain compared with using the EQ alone.
5. Increase wireless mic mobility.
 Back to top
           What about that 6 to 9 dB increase in gain?
Gain increase from equalization really depends on the characteristics of the sound system and the room. Returning to our imaginary system in the shower room, the sound bounces off the hard tile surfaces and reflects back into the microphone with only a slight touch of the volume slider. If you filter the first feedback point, you can only increase the volume fader a touch more before the second feedback occurs at a new frequency. Even if you filter six different resonance points, you may only achieve 1 or 2 decibels of net gain because there are so many low-energy resonant paths.

When we set our system in a large open field and the speakers are far away from the microphone, we really have to crank it up before we hear the first feedback. We would need an enormous system to drive six feedback points. In this system, damping six feedback points could easily deliver well over 15 dB net gain!
 Back to top
          How much gain do you achieve with the six FBX filters?
Six resonance points worth — whatever that happens to be in your unique system. You can maximize your gain by following our anti-feedback directives and by learning more about how the FBX® filters work best for your situation.
 Back to top
          Microphone Mobility
Mobile karaoke and wireless microphones present a special feedback challenge. It does little good to set a number of filters for a mounted microphone if you plan to carry the mic around the stage to different locations. Each position on the stage has its own unique set of resonant frequencies, so the filters that control feedback in one location will probably not provide much help in other locations. You are faced with a balancing act. If you insert too many filters in the system, you will hear a degradation of the sound quality. If you set too few filters, you will not have enough mobility or gain. In this case, it is usually best to walk around the stage area until you find an area where feedback is a particular problem. Then place one or two feedback control filters to take care of that location and repeat the process in the next few areas. FBX® filters add less gain to mobile systems than to fixed microphone systems, but they add a significant increase in the usable area while preserving the natural clear sounds.
 Back to top
          Feedback Control During the Program
One of the most powerful features of the FBX is that it can eliminate feedback during the program. FBX filters come in two types: fixed and dynamic. Both filters are placed the same way: Feedback is detected, and the filter is placed just deep enough to eliminate it. The difference comes after the filter is placed. Fixed filters remain on the initially detected feedback tone — they do not move. These filters provide the initial maximum gain before feedback and are set automatically during setup. Dynamic filters can release and move to new feedback frequencies and are for adaptive feedback control during the performance.

 Back to top
          Hearing is Believing
To hear the difference for yourself, insert an FBX in your sound system and bypass it. Mount the mics on stands to fix their positions. Remove as much feedback as possible using your normal method with just the graphic EQ. Next, lower the volume, bypass the graphic EQ, and activate the FBX. Now slowly raise the gain of the system until at least six FBX filters have kicked in. Next, turn down the mics and play your favorite CD through the system. Alternately listen to the system with just the FBX and then just the graphic EQ. You will hear the FBX provides much clearer, brighter and louder sound. If you do not have immediate access to an FBX, run this experiment with a graphic EQ alone. You will be amazed to hear what it does to your sound.
Back to top

GLOSSARY: Definitions of "tech" terms
We have the ability to hear an amazing range of loudness. People placed in an absolutely quiet anechoic chamber eventually perceive the sound of air molecules hitting their eardrums. On the other hand, people working near jet engines hear sounds a billion times more powerful.

Engineers have developed a convention that economizes the calculations of such an enormous range of values. This convention describes these changes in terms of decibels (abbreviated dB) named in honor of Alexander Graham Bell. Many non-technical people find the different uses of the term decibels confusing because it seems to have so many different meanings. For example, decibels are commonly used to describe the loudness of a sound, the change in loudness (or gain) from one time to another, for changes in signal voltage, and a number of other technical measurements involving the power ratio of large numbers. While we gladly leave these calculations to the engineers, it is helpful to realize that a change of 1 dB is equivalent to a 27 percent change in power.

With this in mind, we realize that turning up the system gain by 3 dB increases the power approximately 100% (27% x 3). In other words, turning up the amp from 400 Watts to 800 Watts adds about 3 dB to the system gain. Wow! Does doubling the power from 400 Watts to 800 Watts make it sound twice as loud? No! A three decibel change sounds only slightly louder. In general, you have to increase the power about 10 times (or 10 dB) to make the sound seem twice as loud. When engineers describe the loudness of a sound in terms of decibels, they are comparing the sound pressure level of a particular sound com-pared to an international standard. Fig. 4 gives several common reference points.
Click images
to view

Loudness in Decibels
Fig. 4

Typical Frequency Response
Typical Frequency Response
 Back to top
Gain is a measure of the change in power (or loudness) in a sound system. For example, turning up the amp causes an increase in gain, while moving away from the speakers causes a decrease in gain. By convention, gain is expressed in decibels
 Back to top
FEEDBACK describes what happens when a loudspeaker disperses sound back into an amplified microphone, and at a level sufficient to allow one or more frequencies to ring out of control. Feedback can occur at any frequency, but is especially painful at mid to high frequencies. The specific frequencies that feedback in a particular situation depend on the acoustics of the environment, the placement of the microphone(s) and speaker(s), the response characteristics of the sound system components, and the volume of amplification. Anyone who has operated a sound system or attended a conference or a concert is familiar with feedback and its unpleasant consequences!
 Back to top
           Net Gain Before Feedback
Many people measure their increase in gain by the amount they push up the mixer's calibrated slider. But if adding gain causes feedback, you will have to cut the gain of the feedback frequency at the EQ in order to add gain at the mixer. A more accurate concept could be called NET gain. It is the amount of gain you achieve pushing up the mixer slider, minus the gain you lose lowering the EQ sliders. NET gain is the gain you realize in front of the speakers as measured by a sound pressure level meter. That is the gain that matters.
Click images
to view

Net Gain=Mixer minus EQ
Net Gain=Mixer minus EQ
 Back to top
           Frequency Response Curves
A frequency response curve is a graph that shows the gain of a component or a group of components at different frequencies. Fig. 6 shows the frequency response of a typical equalizer with the 1,000 Hz slider pulled down 12 dB. The frequency response curve shows that the biggest cut in power, called the center frequency is at 1,000 Hz, that the filter removes half of the power (-3 dB) between 645 Hz and 1550 Hz, the Q of the filter is 1550-645 Hz/1000 Hz (.905), and the maximum depth is -12 dB. Fig. 6 shows the frequency response of two adjacent sliders pulled down 12 dB. Notice that the center frequency of the two sliders is at 885 Hz. The combined filter width is 1.49 octave and the two filters add together to give a maximum depth of -19.3 dB.
Frequency Response Curves
Fig. 6
 Back to top
           Noise Gate/ Comb Filters
As we mentioned earlier, every microphone creates a potential source of feedback, so it is advantageous to turn off microphones that are not currently being used. Noise gates do this automatically by continuously monitoring the program's loudness. If the loudness falls below a threshold set by the user, the noise gate automatically turns off the microphone. Once the loudness exceeds the threshold, the microphone channel automatically turns back on.

Noise gates are useful for a number of important sound applications besides feedback control. For example, if a person or instrument is picked up by two microphones placed in different locations, the combined mic signals will interfere with each other, causing a type of distortion called comb filters. Comb filters add gain at certain frequencies and thus increase the chance of feedback. At the same time, they cut the gain at other frequencies, causing the program to sound thin and over-equalized. Gating the unused microphones eliminates this source of comb filtering. Noise gates are often employed in CD players to eliminate noise between songs. They are similarly used in sound systems to mute the hiss of noisy electronic components during quiet periods. Most Sabine FBX Feedback Exterminators® feature user-programmable noise gates.
 Back to top
           The Frequency Spectrum
People with excellent hearing can hear frequencies between 20 and 20,000 vibrations per second or Hertz. Fig. 10 shows an imaginary 120 key keyboard that would be big enough to play all the notes that we can hear. The lowest key would play a 20 Hz "E" and the highest key would play a 19,912 Hz "D#." Notice that doubling the frequency raises the pitch one octave. We hear the same one-octave musical interval between 40 and 80 Hz as we do between 10,000 and 20,000 Hertz. A graphic equalizer is superimposed that shows which sliders affect the notes of several instruments. For example, the chart shows that the 250 Hz slider affects most of the bottom 1/3 of a guitar's range.

The typical FBX filter below the EQ shows the relatively smaller size and effect on sound of FBX filters and illustrates why they cause less tonal change and gain loss. The nine FBX filters are not preset on any particular frequencies like EQ filters. They are placed precisely where feedback occurs.
Click images
to view

Typical Frequency Response
Fig. 10
 Back to top
          Constant-Q Filters
It is common to describe a filter's quality factor, or "Q," as the center frequency of the filter divided by the filter width (in Hertz) measured at the -3 dB point. Filters that have the same Q, or width, at the -3 dB point regardless of the filter's cut or boost are called constant Q filters. Filters that get wider as the filter gets deeper are called proportional Q filters. There seems to be a new development in the audio industry. The definition of constant Q is blurring. Many equalizer manufacturers claim their equalizers have constant Q filters, when in fact they get substantially wider as they get deeper. The only way to know for sure if the filters are truly constant Q is to inspect their frequency response curves.
Constant Q filter
Constant Q filter

Typical proportional Q filter
Proportional Q filter
 Back to top
          Parametric Equalizer
A parametric equalizer allows the user to precisely specify three critical values that determine an equalizer’s quality: the center frequency of the EQ band that is boosted or cut (measured in Hertz), the amount of boost or cut imposed at the center point (measured in dB), and the width of the bell-curve shaped frequency band that is affected (typically measured in octaves).
 Back to top
          FBX Filter
An FBX filter is essentially an automatically placed, narrowly attenuated parametric filter, with the center point of its narrow cut tuned to a precise frequency that feeds back when a sound system amplifies one or more microphones to a sufficient volume. For example, the Sabine Graphi-Q will automatically place up to 12 FBX filters in the signal path, corresponding to 12 distinct frequencies of feedback.
 Back to top
          Fixed FBX Filter
A fixed FBX filter will not change the frequency of the filter notch. Once it sets itself, it remains at the same frequency. However, unless it is LOCKED, a FIXED filter may move its notch deeper without changing frequency. Fixed filters are typically set by turning up system gain to the point of feedback prior to sound check or performance, and will represent the “first layer” of feedback protection.
 Back to top
          Dynamic FBX Filter
A Dynamic FBX Filter acts like a fixed filter, until all available FBX filters (Fixed or Dynamic) are in use and a new frequency begins to feedback. When this happens, whichever Dynamic filter was set earliest in the performance will drop its original frequency and move to the new one. Dynamic filters are especially useful with mobile or wireless microphones (where feedback frequencies may change due to microphone repositioning) and represent the “second layer” of feedback protection. Note that both Fixed and Dynamic filters can be set while music is playing, as one of the distinguishing properties of the Sabine FBX algorithm is its ability to distinguish music (or speech, or other sounds) from feedback.
 Back to top
          Locked FBX Filter
is a Fixed filter locked in place; i.e., it cannot get any deeper or change its frequency. Locking filters prevents the placement of unnecessary filters in the signal path.
 Back to top
          Filter Width
generally refers to the width (measured in octaves, or fractions thereof) of an equalizer, including graphic EQ filters, parametric filters, and FBX filters. More specifically, width is defined by determining the outer frequencies (surrounding the filter center point) that are altered ± 3 dB when the filter is imposed. This is shown in the diagram below:
In this example, the filter width is defined as approximately one-half octave, corresponding to the band of frequencies attenuated 3 dB or more when the filter is pulled down. In this example, the width is the same whether the filter depth is -9 dB or -19 dB.
 Back to top
           Setup Mode
Setup mode maximizes the Sabine FBX Feedback Exterminator® clip level and sets all FBX parameters to a more sensitive-to-feedback condition than normal operation. It also places a “moving limiter” that tracks gain changes as feedback occurs, but allows the feedback to occur at a quieter level. Feedback is created by slowly raising the master mixer output with all the mics that might create a feedback problem open and turned on. Please read Setup Mode Cautions
 Back to top
          Auto Setup Mode
Automatic Setup mode is a form of Setup Mode that lets the Sabine FBX Feedback Exterminator® automatically control the gain and automatically “ring out” feedback frequencies. Automatic Setup also imposes a limiter on the feedback volume, thus allowing system setup with quiet feedback levels. Please read Setup Mode Cautions
 Back to top
          Setup Mode Cautions
Setup Mode is designed to allow fast and quiet feedback elimination during setup. Setup Mode should ONLY be used for pre-performance setup. DO NOT USE SETUP MODE DURING A PERFORMANCE! This will produce distorted audio and set filters on music or audio program. Setup Mode also may not work well during setup in a very noisy environment. To speed up feedback elimination, Setup relaxes its criteria for distinguishing “good” audio from feedback and places filters more readily. If the environment is noisy, there is a greater likelihood of placing a filter on audio that is not feedback. Consult your Operating Guide for details on how to operate Setup Mode on your Sabine FBX Feedback Exterminator®.

Back to top
For more information on Sabine products, email us or call (386) 418-2000.
13301 NW US Highway 441 • Alachua, Florida • 32615 • USA • Voice  (386)  418-2000  • Fax  (386)  418-2001
A l l  R i g h t s  R e s e r v e d  ©  S a b i n e ,  I n c .